🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.